Over 59422
politifake

Tinfoil Politics


THE "TINFOIL HAT" - Did you know that "tinfoil hat" you are wearing is really made out of a toxic metal called "aluminum?"




Climate Research And Propaganda Of Liberal Activists (C.R.A.P.O.L.A.) -


TAGS: cilmate change tinfoil hat denial
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 12:26 pm
So, you're finished with your 'latest' meltdown?
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 12:13 pm
See #76125.
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 12:11 pm
Your fake mustache FTL :) http://cdn.meme.am/instances/45470299.jpg #CHECKMATE
freasy - May 12, 2015, 12:09 pm
OK, prove it
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 12, 2015, 11:54 am
lololol! What a brilliant comeback. From what I can see of your postings, it's typical. Can't respond with anything worthwhile, just use either use ts;cr or "obvious denier troll" lolol
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 11:15 am
Polar bears are fun :) you keep mentioning them over and over again. Yes - they are cute and cuddly, and easy for your simple mind to wrap around. Stick with that. Here - www.jaunted.com/files/3873/Flocke_the_Polar_Bear.jpg
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 11:11 am
Master's Degree in Physics. Minors in environmental science and computer science. Your 'indictment' of fake "dat", as you spelled it, or the "ica age", whatever the hell that is, speaks volumes of someone who hasn't seriously participated in academia, hun
freasy - May 12, 2015, 10:55 am
And your advanced degrees are in what subject???
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 10:15 am
Obvious denier troll is obvious.
freasy - May 12, 2015, 10:07 am
SO, what happened to the ica age predicted by the scientific community in the 70s? Fake Dat, Fake models, no warming last 10 years and lots more polar bears.......
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 9:09 pm
lol
Zeitguy - May 11, 2015, 8:54 pm
I was always a big fan of George Gervin also. Oh sorry, that was the Iceman Bringeth :)
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 8:31 pm
Never mind then. It's a classic. Figured you might've, given your age. You should give it a gander, though. What you said in #76072 was much a "Hickey" moment-of-revelation. Very eye-opening, in the same vein of "Iceman." Have a good one, mate. Cheers :-)
OTC - May 11, 2015, 8:25 pm
No and no
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 6:08 pm
So, I will ask you one more time: Have you seen or read "The Iceman Cometh"? Or is all of this stalling so you can buy yourself enough time to google it throughly so you can pretend u did and pretend to respond intelligently like you do w/MMCC? X-D (2/2)
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 6:05 pm
Couple steps ahead of you as usual, OTC. You're Splitting hairs. It was clear that I meant putting side your "denier" climate change debate. The over-all debate is still chugging along,despite your propensity to focus on semantics as a "red-herring."(1/2)
OTC - May 11, 2015, 5:58 pm
I believe it was you that said "Putting this "debate" ASIDE for a moment..." therefore, how could I avoid the debate when it was aside for a moment for you to ask a question? Wouldn't that be avoiding the question rather than the debate? hmmm
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 5:50 pm
Not annoyed. Perplexed. I interpreted #76086 as you dodging the question and running away from the debate(s) you start, like "you often do" (and you just did...again). ;-) #vintageotc
OTC - May 11, 2015, 5:43 pm
Just responding with absurdity like you often do (e.g. comment #75970) Annoying, isn't it?
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 4:26 pm
*chirp* *chirp* http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fp0VNxnODYM/UhOswyKrKbI/AAAAAAAADus/VzcNMFxE2PA/s1600/crickets.gif
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 2:45 pm
*sigh* :-/ It's not about "icemen" or "snowmen" or "scientists" or "gods." It's not a Disney cartoon about frigid angry sisters or a spinoff Marvel movie about the mutant X-men. It's a play by Eugene O'Neill. It's a straight question. So, yes or no?
OTC - May 11, 2015, 2:35 pm
So you're saying icemen are scientists, or gods?
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 9:42 am
Not exactly, mate. Are you familiar with “The Iceman Cometh?"
OTC - May 11, 2015, 6:17 am
God again? Another red herring?
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 12:52 am
Putting this "debate" aside for a moment,science really isnt the enemy of God that you think it is.Some Christians even think that by science proving he doesnt exist in THIS world,it returns him to the world NOT OF this realm. Food for thought ;-) (2/2)
fauxnews - May 11, 2015, 12:48 am
The words "very likely" are your ace-in-the-hole in this? lololol..In that 'card' you think you are holding, and the confidence you exude in acting like 'you-really-got'em-by-the-ba.lls', you reveal that really do have the lowest opinion of science(1/2)
OTC - May 11, 2015, 12:01 am
An unequivocal theory, got it. And you mean NASA is actually "very likely" settled on MMCC. Just as they think its very likely human induced warming.
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 11:14 pm
Science is based on theory. There is no point in explaining the skeptical-by-nature design of science if your cognitive dissonance won't let you hear what I have to say. NASA is actually very settled on MMCC, mate. But since when do you listen to facts?
OTC - May 10, 2015, 10:42 pm
Who has refuted science? Even NASA says the warming is "very likely" human induced, which doesn't sound settled or unequivocal


PREV PAGE